3 ms·
What you are suggesting is actually quite complex. Mailchimp would have to install a bunch of stuff on customers servers (which are probably run by a third part
by codeulike 8y ago
What you are suggesting is actually quite complex. Mailchimp would have to install a bunch of stuff on customers servers (which are probably run by a third party) and/or control some of their customers subdomains.
Maybe you just need to invest some money in better spam filters, and user education.
- slivym 8y agoI'm sorry but there is no level of user education that will protect a large organisation from phishing links. The attack surface is way too large and safety depends on how the user is feeling on any given day when a random email turns up. There are no high reliability systems that require manual user interaction on a frequent basis especially on low-effort low-concentration tasks.
- hyperpape 8y agoI agree about the insufficiency of user-education. I think we need go further: what we need to do is kill the idea that email is an good vector for notifications inside of big organizations (or maybe even outside of them). I should have a dedicated app with a whitelist based system that official notifications go through. This could be not only a security improvement, but also a stab at better UX, better productivity, and avoiding notification fatigue.
- cmroanirgo 8y ago> emails.ecommercesite.example/products/brown-boots/buytoday/4918ac7 Wouldn't a CNAME cover it? It's the way that gmail.example.com gets routed to google's servers.
- Ensorceled 8y agoThis year the Canada Revenue Service is running an ad campaign saying they aren't calling/emailing Canadians and demanding they go buy gift cards at Rexall/Shoppers Drug Mart/Sobeys in order to not go to jail for tax fraud. Better user education is a non-starter.