3 ms·
"about twice the quantity seen in the Sahara Desert" Ok, surely there has to be something better to compare this to than one of the largest deserts in the worl
by j_baker 16y ago
"about twice the quantity seen in the Sahara Desert"
Ok, surely there has to be something better to compare this to than one of the largest deserts in the world.
- ceejayoz 16y agoI think the point they're trying to make is that people are able to live on the amount of water in the Sahara, so lunar colonisation is therefore feasible from the water front.
- evilduck 16y agoIt's a bad analogy twice over. There's huge amounts of aquifer water under the it, just not much on the surface. If your removed surface bodies of water from Earth and needed to place an outpost somewhere where you could still get water, you could do a lot worse than the Sahara.