> That doesn't mean that we shouldn't give it our best shot Can you unpack that a bit? I’d argue a fake solution like the the Paris Accord is actively harmful

> That doesn't mean that we shouldn't give it our best shot Can you unpack that a bit? I’d argue a fake solution like the the Paris Accord is actively harmful. It’s the equivalent of banning the use of guns for 4 hours on a Tuesday morning punishable by a $100 fine and thinking that it’s going to help reduce gun violence. At best it will convince people you have no clue and can be safely ignored.