3 ms·
> didn't have any real issues Citation needed. If you want better arguments, you merely need read the rest of this thread. I wasn't arguing pro regulation. I w
by madrox 8y ago
> didn't have any real issues
Citation needed. If you want better arguments, you merely need read the rest of this thread. I wasn't arguing pro regulation. I was arguing how silly it sounds when someone calls this a move to "criminalize competition."
- leetcrew 8y agoi'd say it's a pretty reasonable inference from the article, which mentions two interested parties: the The Commercial Drone Alliance (commercial advocate), which supports the repeal, and the Academy of Model Aeronautics (hobbyist organization), which opposes it. now why is it that these two orgs which are both interested in drones have such different stances?