3 ms·

You should write the Uniform Law Commission to enact private property rights up to 200’. [1] They are already considering this. You should have the right to f

• nybble41 8y ago
  That proposal appears to only create additional restrictions: operating a drone under 200' without the permission of the property owner would be considered "aerial trespass". There was nothing in the article about guaranteeing the right to fly drones up to 200' over your own property. One presumes that under this proposal you would need the permission of both the property owner and the FAA.
  • poof131 8y ago
    By establishing property rights you make a stronger case for the right to fly a drone on your property. Certainly the FAA will have a safety say, but property rights will also be important. In the end, much of this may be decided by the courts.