2 ms·
Google+ was successful.in limited groups, where others were more likely to be also involved (for example, tabletop RPGs have a much stronger g+ community than m
by ergothus 8y ago
Google+ was successful.in limited groups, where others were more likely to be also involved (for example, tabletop RPGs have a much stronger g+ community than many other hobbies).
This inevitably leads to confusion about popular/competitive it is. See also the final years of word perfect, where it was the norm in medical and legal circles but nowhere else.