4 ms·

This logic is bizarre to me. He can’t consent to being fed, clothed or having his diaper changed either. I imagine she likely still does all three. For a paren

• saghm 8y ago
  Not feeding, clothing, or changing your baby's diaper is objectively bad for their health; not sharing their pictures on Facebook is not anywhere close to that. I don't see how it's bizarre to want to keep your baby healthy but otherwise let them decide things for themselves once they're old enough.
• bogomipz 8y ago
  >"For a parent, making choices on your child’s behalf is kinda part of the deal" And this person has made the decision for their child that whatever social media company is not going to own their child's image. What is is "bizarre" about that. I hardly think caring for a child and letting a corporation own their image are even remotely the same thing.
  • giobox 8y ago
    I don’t disagree with anything you’ve said, it’s perfectly fair, but what you’ve said is not the logic she is using. If she had said this I see no logical discrepancy, but to couch your logic in terms of a child’s lack of consent is the point that makes little sense.