5 ms·
In a surprise to no one, it doesn't run at 5 Ghz like their demo did. Still, 4.3 is very impressive for that many cores. I'm curious how it stacks up against th
by piinbinary 8y ago
In a surprise to no one, it doesn't run at 5 Ghz like their demo did. Still, 4.3 is very impressive for that many cores. I'm curious how it stacks up against the 32-core threadripper.
- KenanSulayman 8y agoDidn't they use liquid nitrogen cooling and “forgot to mention it”? [1] [1] https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-28-core-cpu-5ghz,37244.html https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-28-core-cpu-5ghz,372...
- Latteland 8y agoI guess it should stop being surprising that, just like in June, Intel can't seem to cope with amd beating them. They just outright lied in June (your article reminds us), and this seems like a slightly smaller lie?
- geogeim 8y ago4.3 turbo probably for one core out of 28 .. for a few seconds. I would compare it to epyc though, considering price (Xeon 8180m which is basically the same die with a locked multiplier is 13.000$, even slashing the high margins i don't think intel will sell this one anywhere near epyc's 4000$)