3 ms·
That's good news, the WebRTC world is too much of a libusrsctp monoculture to my taste at the moment. Don't be surprised if you find some interesting edge cases
by jlaine 8y ago
That's good news, the WebRTC world is too much of a libusrsctp monoculture to my taste at the moment. Don't be surprised if you find some interesting edge cases in browsers as you stray from the beaten track :)
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1443032 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1443032
- simmons 8y agoYipes! That's good to know about, thanks. At the same time, I've also been surprised at how lenient the browsers are at accepting associations from my incomplete implementation (e.g. without the required SCTP extensions, etc.).
- jlaine 8y agoI can confirm you can get data channels to work with zero SCTP extensions, I only added them afterwards! One implementation (libusrsctp-based) you might want to interop with is rawrtc. Like aiortc's datachannel-cli example, it features copy-and-paste signaling which makes testing easy. https://github.com/rawrtc/rawrtc https://github.com/rawrtc/rawrtc Lennart, rawrtc's author is very knowledgeable in all things DataChannels and active in the standardization process.