4 ms·
Maybe: 1. There really was a supply chain attack, but Apple and AWS did not detect it. 2. Trump Administration staff worked with Bloomberg reporters on an dom
by bigmonads 8y ago
Maybe:
1. There really was a supply chain attack, but Apple and AWS did not detect it.
2. Trump Administration staff worked with Bloomberg reporters on an domestic propaganda piece to expose the attack in a public way amid China-US trade war.
3. They blundered coordination of their strategic communications, not expecting companies to question the story.
This allows us to consistently believe that:
a. There was a supply chain attack.
b. The companies mentioned were not those who detected it.
c. Intelligence and Tech have different perspectives/stories.
d. All actors/parties are acting in a way consistent with their missions, objectives, and incentives.
- hprotagonist 8y agoGiven the people involved, #2 is a weak assertion.
- bigmonads 8y agoThanks, fixed.