3 ms·
Core Generation | Microarchitecture | Process Node | Release Year -----------------|-------------------|--------------|-------------- 2nd | San
by josu 8y ago
Core Generation | Microarchitecture | Process Node | Release Year
-----------------|-------------------|--------------|--------------
2nd | Sandy Bridge | 32nm | 2011
3rd | Ivy Bridge | 22nm | 2012
4th | Haswell | 22nm | 2013
5th | Broadwell | 14nm | 2014
6th | Skylake | 14nm | 2015
7th | Kaby Lake | 14nm+ | 2016
8th | Kaby Lake-R | 14nm+ | 2017
| Coffee Lake-S | 14nm++ | 2017-2018
| Kaby Lake-G | 14nm+ | 2018
| Coffee Lake-U/H | 14nm++ | 2018
| Whiskey Lake-U | 14nm++ | 2018
| Amber Lake-Y | 14nm+ | 2018
| Cannon Lake-U | 10nm | 2017*
9th | C. Lake Refre | 14nm% | 2018
* Single CPU For Revenue
% Intel '14nm Class'
- Aardwolf 8y agoWhy did they introduce so confusingly many microarchitecture names for 8th gen...
- mfaticaearnin 8y agobecause they are failing
- majewsky 8y agoMarketing. New names make it appear as though progress is made.
- szatkus 8y agoBecause 10nm is horribly delayed. Skylake was going to be replaced by Cannon Lake, but instead they introduced bunch of Skylake's flavours (and one horrible chip based on Cannon Lake which was just a marketing stunt).
- paulmd 8y agoThey've always been there. He's skipping all the mobile/embedded/high-GPU variants for the predecessor to make things look worse for 8th gen. There have always been U, H, Y, R, and sometimes C variants for most of those prior generations. Each die gets a codename, just like now.
- bdcravens 8y agoI assume they’re waiting for a Friday the 13th to announce Crystal Lake?