3 ms·
Ah, that makes sense. A conscious choice to trade high salaries for high security, I assume?
by village-idiot 8y ago
Ah, that makes sense. A conscious choice to trade high salaries for high security, I assume?
- antaviana 8y agoA more paternalistic approach by the state. It adds more protection by law for the population less likely to purchase such protection out of their pocket. It’s probably less efficient but less ruthless for those who do not know any better and could easily become homeless shortly after losing a job.