3 ms·
Are you just assuming the second part? The privacy policy doesn’t mention anything about this, except that third-party integrations may have ads, but they’re no
by brennebeck 8y ago
Are you just assuming the second part? The privacy policy doesn’t mention anything about this, except that third-party integrations may have ads, but they’re not served via FB, etc.
- mwambua 8y agoThey're really cagey about it though: > Portal does not have Facebook ads at this time. Some third-party services on Portal (e.g., music partners) may embed ads in their content in the same way they do when providing their services on other devices. How about no ads, ever?
- mcintyre1994 8y agoThat'd mean blocking eg. Spotify's free service though.
- cjhopman 8y agoThat would make for a pretty terrible device. It would mean no web browser. No software that wasn't carefully vetted. Probably no app ecosystem at all. I mean, go for it, but you're serving a very small market at that point.
- CaptainZapp 8y agoPortal does not have Facebook ads at this time Sure, Mr. Zuckerberg, whatever. We totally trust you not to clandestinely change that in the future, because you're such a trustworthy guy running a totally trustworthy company.[1] You would never, say, make information marked as private suddenly public without the user even knowing, right? You would, of course, never screw around with privacy defaults without letting the user even know, correct? On a less sarcastic note. If you put a spy device manufactured by facebook into your place of living and trust them to keep their "promises" you really deserve what you get. [1] https://www.businessinsider.com/embarrassing-and-damaging-zuckerberg-ims-confirmed-by-zuckerberg-the-new-yorker-2010-9?op=1 https://www.businessinsider.com/embarrassing-and-damaging-zu...