3 ms·
Eh, I'm not sure there was a "criminal case". The cops were working as security staff of the place, not on duty; seems reasonable that they would have a word wi
by icebraining 8y ago
Eh, I'm not sure there was a "criminal case". The cops were working as security staff of the place, not on duty; seems reasonable that they would have a word with someone trying to break the movie theater rules. It's the escalation from "having a word" to "forcible removal" to "on the floor not breathing" that is absurd.
- M_Bakhtiari 8y agoThey stil acted as if there was. But the worst thing the kid could be accused of is being in breach of contract for seeing more screenings than indicated on his ticket. Besides, it would make a lot more business sense to take it as an opportunity to sell more tickets rather than to remove him.