> Perhaps Bloomberg's reporters fell for a conspiracy theory this time. According to > https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/10/04/supermicro_bloomberg/?page=3 h

> Perhaps Bloomberg's reporters fell for a conspiracy theory this time. According to > https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/10/04/supermicro_bloomberg/?page=3 https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/10/04/supermicro_bloomber... "Bloomberg reporters receive bonuses based indirectly on how much they shift markets with their reporting. This story undoubtedly did that. The publisher employs roughly 2,000 journalists, who are encouraged to work together and share information through their Bloomberg Terminals, with many layers of editing and fact checking, and it has a zero tolerance on errors: it is inconceivable that it would publish a story this huge that wasn't watertight."