4 ms·
Also, interviewing is a weeding-out process. If they tell you what you did wrong, then you (and anyone else you share that information with) will become better
by umjames 16y ago
Also, interviewing is a weeding-out process. If they tell you what you did wrong, then you (and anyone else you share that information with) will become better at gaming that process. This makes it harder for them to tell whether they have a good candidate or someone who can game the system well.
- eru 16y agoYes. Though often you can just ask for some feedback off-the-record.
- base10 16y agoA good interview process should be resistant to gaming. For instance, multiple interviews. Multiple people doing the interviewing. Asking the candidate to demonstrate a capacity to do the work. But, let's say the candidate does successfully game the interview and gets hired. Your company should absolutely use the first N-days of a new hire to check fit. Many I've seen explicitly say the first three or six months is a probationary period. The problem is when companies aren't honest with themselves about making a bad hire (capability or fit) and letting the new hire go. Particularly for internal job candidates, I highly recommend being direct and saying, "Here's where you're short. Here's what you can work on over the next year or so to get into a better position. It's not a guarantee, but you'll be better prepared." Give them homework. If a candidate is really and truly interested, they'll follow through on the advice and follow-up on it. That gives you a better candidate to look at for your next req.