> Second, this ban seems to assume a position that Breitbart can't be a valid source even if they use outside sources corroborating their claim Really, it isn'

> Second, this ban seems to assume a position that Breitbart can't be a valid source even if they use outside sources corroborating their claim Really, it isn't that complex. Most people learn this in kindergarten, if not before. Every heard of the "boy who cried wolf"? At no time does anyone suggest if the boy turned up with the wolf's head under his arm you would disbelieve him. But later when telling people "I believe there is a wolf now" you don't say it's because "the boy told me [again]", instead you hold up the head. Well, it's the same for Breitbart. Saying "it's true because Breitbart said it's true" is just going to get you tarnished with Breitbart's reputation, but handing out Breitbart's citation might just do the trick.