4 ms·
I think it's more likely just an attempt to reduce their license fees. The music licensing societies (at least in the UK) have different classes of license, at
by samstokes 16y ago
I think it's more likely just an attempt to reduce their license fees.
The music licensing societies (at least in the UK) have different classes of license, at different price points, and licenses which allow "interactive use" are much more expensive. The distinction is (IANAL) about whether or not the user has detailed control over what tracks they listen to, and in what order.
The features they're removing sound a lot like "interactive use":
* Loved Tracks Radio: streaming your list of loved tracks
* Playlists: streaming a list of tracks you've chosen for a playlist
* Personal Tag Radio: streaming a list of artists, albums or tracks that you have tagged
- russss 16y agoYes, it's an interactive/non-interactive distinction in play. (DMCA has become a synonym for "non-interactive" in the industry.) Last.fm has always argued that these radio modes were non-interactive, but the labels have clearly got the better of them.
- timmaah 16y agoThose also used to be their main selling points for folks subscribe to lastfm. Their revenue from subscriptions must not be enough to affect their decisions with regards to license fees