3 ms·
Considering the article points fingers at China, I wonder if their evidence was manufactured by someone. Without proof (like a board) or the names of actual wit
by coldcode 8y ago
Considering the article points fingers at China, I wonder if their evidence was manufactured by someone. Without proof (like a board) or the names of actual witnesses or hard documents or something, its basically unverifiable, like claiming Area 51 has aliens. Without proof it's indistinguishable from fiction.
- jancsika 8y agoIt would be like claiming Area 51 has aliens after over 100 interviews with 17 people familiar with the aliens, including two at Lockheed Martin and three at Boeing.
- Canada 8y agoNone of whom are identified on the record.
- charlysl 8y agoFar more plausible that alien stories though.
- forapurpose 8y ago> Considering the article points fingers at China, I wonder if their evidence was manufactured by someone. What is the connection? > Without proof (like a board) or the names of actual witnesses or hard documents or something, its basically unverifiable, like claiming Area 51 has aliens. A Bloomberg article based on a year of reporting, 100 interviews, etc. is as likely as aliens? Hmmm ... I feel I can distinguish it pretty easily.