3 ms·
I disagree. Snapchat, at least conceptually to me, is for more private, candid, or even meaningless conversations to close friends. I have very little of a fil
by dannyw 8y ago
I disagree.
Snapchat, at least conceptually to me, is for more private, candid, or even meaningless conversations to close friends. I have very little of a filter on snapchat - and messages and snaps disappearing after a day certainly helps.
Whereas with Instagram, etc, it's about 'showing your best'. There's a layer of artificialness to it.
Unfortunately, literally 90% of my friends left Snapchat after the redesign. This blame can solely and directly be attributed to a brazen CEO.
- kposehn 8y agoI disagree with your disagreement ;) In all seriousness, I understand your point, but what you’re referring to is a feature of a messaging/social product, not necessarily a product itself. In Snapchat’ case, everything that makes it unique is easily duplicated by Instagram, outside of the people on it. However, your comment on Instagram is actually about the marketing of the product, not necessarily the product itself. Basically, if you take away the branding and the interface and distill down Instagram and Snapchat into the core functionality, there is little difference outside the network of users.