4 ms·

> "The immediate objects are the total destruction and devastation of their settlements and the capture of as many prisoners of every age and sex as possible. I

> "The immediate objects are the total destruction and devastation of their settlements and the capture of as many prisoners of every age and sex as possible. It will be essential to ruin their crops now in the ground and prevent their planting more." There is far worse if you dig further into the history of george washington and his father/grandfather in regards to the native americans. > This is part of the scorched earth tactics that resulted in not only the death of millions of natives but the almost extinction of the American Bison, an importance source of food and clothing for many tribes. "Kill Every Buffalo You Can! Every Buffalo Dead Is an Indian Gone" https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2016/05/the-buffalo-killers/482349/ https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2016/05/the-buf... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bison_skull_pile_edit.jpg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bison_skull_pile_edit.jpg It is no secret that the architects of nazi germany admired the genocide of the native americans and modeled themselves after the US. And yet, we are in such denial about our role in the death of natives. ( It was "smallpox" ). "termed a "war of extermination" by Governor Peter Burnett who declared warfare would not cease with Native Americans "until the Indian race becomes extinct"" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Hardeman_Burnett https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Hardeman_Burnett

partycoder 8y ago
> It is no secret that the architects of nazi germany admired the genocide of the native americans Nazi Germany borrowed tactics from American ethnic cleansing initiatives, but simultaneously they entertained the idea of having Native Americans as allies in the event of an American invasion. The German film "Der Kaiser von Kalifornien" portrayed Native Americans in a positive light.
xenadu02 8y ago
> And yet, we are in such denial about our role in the death of natives. ( It was "smallpox" ) You make a good point but you're also wrong. The way the colonies (and later United States) treated the natives was absolutely deplorable and immoral. The US (from the founding fathers until very recent times) is as guilty as you say. HOWEVER... it cannot be denied that the accidental spread of European diseases wiped out over 50% of all natives before the era of colonization even began. Even today if contact is made with isolated peoples great care must be taken and medical services kept on stand-by. A disease ravaging the isolated group is a very, very real possibility. It also means if humanity does every colonize another planet (even in our own solar system), if the flow of people ever stops we may not be able to re-establish it due to disease risk.
- specializeded 8y ago
  It’s also fun to think about the scenario where the Americans practiced husbandry when contact was made, we could have had a two way “genocide”!
  - partycoder 8y ago
    For that you would need an animal that breeds in captivity, reaches maturity quickly, eats inexpensive food (not meat), with good temperament, and that can be handled in a farming environment (not as agile as deer or as strong as a bison). In the Americas, the only animal that responds to that description are llamas, guinea pigs, capybaras, etc. None of them found in North America.
    - specializeded 8y ago
      Yes, I’ve read 1491 as well :)
      - partycoder 8y ago
        And I assume 1491 was not all original research :)

partycoder 8y ago

> It is no secret that the architects of nazi germany admired the genocide of the native americans Nazi Germany borrowed tactics from American ethnic cleansing initiatives, but simultaneously they entertained the idea of having Native Americans as allies in the event of an American invasion. The German film "Der Kaiser von Kalifornien" portrayed Native Americans in a positive light.

xenadu02 8y ago

> And yet, we are in such denial about our role in the death of natives. ( It was "smallpox" ) You make a good point but you're also wrong. The way the colonies (and later United States) treated the natives was absolutely deplorable and immoral. The US (from the founding fathers until very recent times) is as guilty as you say. HOWEVER... it cannot be denied that the accidental spread of European diseases wiped out over 50% of all natives before the era of colonization even began. Even today if contact is made with isolated peoples great care must be taken and medical services kept on stand-by. A disease ravaging the isolated group is a very, very real possibility. It also means if humanity does every colonize another planet (even in our own solar system), if the flow of people ever stops we may not be able to re-establish it due to disease risk.

specializeded 8y ago
It’s also fun to think about the scenario where the Americans practiced husbandry when contact was made, we could have had a two way “genocide”!
- partycoder 8y ago
  For that you would need an animal that breeds in captivity, reaches maturity quickly, eats inexpensive food (not meat), with good temperament, and that can be handled in a farming environment (not as agile as deer or as strong as a bison). In the Americas, the only animal that responds to that description are llamas, guinea pigs, capybaras, etc. None of them found in North America.
  - specializeded 8y ago
    Yes, I’ve read 1491 as well :)
    - partycoder 8y ago
      And I assume 1491 was not all original research :)