My understanding is that there is a solid constitutional challenge at the Federal level because the bill specifies designated headquarters rather than, for exam

My understanding is that there is a solid constitutional challenge at the Federal level because the bill specifies designated headquarters rather than, for example, state of incorporation, which means that they are trying to enforce state law on national and international entities. Regarding 'diversity hires', if the experience in Europe is any guide, qualified women will just be members of even more boards than they are now. There's no limit on the number of boards that a person can be a member of.