>You're attempting to deflect the debate here. So let me redirect it back. Providing a direct example debunking your claim isn't deflecting. You claimed republ

>You're attempting to deflect the debate here. So let me redirect it back. Providing a direct example debunking your claim isn't deflecting. You claimed republicans suppressed votes. I showed you that democrats do that same. Not to mention colluding with media but that's another story. > Most wealthy cities deal with poor people by driving them out via policing, taxes and zoning enforcement. How is that better than San Francisco's attempts to tolerate it? Poor people have been displaced already. Not just the poor, the middle class too. > You haven't made an argument here. Sure I did. It's an argument of definition. No sane entity allows non-citizens to vote. It defeats the purpose of voting. It defeats the purpose of citizenship. But you are free to believe whatever you want.