No, I don't disagree with the analysis. I'm referring to the literal use of the term: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism https://www.merriam-

No, I don't disagree with the analysis. I'm referring to the literal use of the term: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism "any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods " I understand what the parent is trying to say and I agree with it, but "socialism only for the rich" is literally not socialism.