3 ms·
>If anything, we just need to spend a bit more time talking to folks about the possible side effects of the medications. What exactly shows us this? >This is
by presscast 8y ago
>If anything, we just need to spend a bit more time talking to folks about the possible side effects of the medications.
What exactly shows us this?
>This is demonstrated in the present each time there is an external threat too.
Can you list some examples?
I'm not trying to be difficult, but this thread is full of assertions and scant on arguments.
I'm genuinely interested, here, but someone has yet to make a substantive argument.
- bachbach 8y agoI think you've inserted a quote from somebody else there. On the history of political Liberalism you need to go and read it to understand where I'm coming from - otherwise what I say to you is just going to sound like my opinion when I'm actually just telling you what is historically uncontroversial and accepted about the philosophy of political liberalism. I recommend reading pages 428 - 448 of "A history of Western Political Thought" by J.S McClelland. There isn't really "an argument" to make here. This isn't an argument at all. Exactly what argument exists to prove Libertarians and Conservatives or Republicans are not Liberals? Both parties get all their ideas from the same political philosophers - J.S Mill, John Locke. > I'm genuinely interested, here, but someone has yet to make a substantive argument. This topic is huge but a lot clearer when you read of the origins.