2 ms·
That's because Cultural Marxism isn't part of any serious scientific publication, it's just a non-sense term used by some far right members.
by realusername 8y ago
That's because Cultural Marxism isn't part of any serious scientific publication, it's just a non-sense term used by some far right members.
- barry-cotter 8y agoAs you might have noticed if you had clicked on either the reddit thread or the amazon link that’s not so. Cultural Marxism and Political Sociology was published in 1981. It’s been cited 40 times. That’s not a seminal work but it’s not marginal either. Cultural Marxism was a self-description before it was ever used as a slur. Product Description A thorough examination and analysis of the tensions between political sociology and the culturally oriented Marxism that emerged in the 60s and 70s is presented in this volume. In order to create a strikingly original synthesis, Weiner considers the work of theorists as diverse as Jurgen Habermas, Claus Offe, Alain Touraine, Anthony Giddens and Alvin Gouldner, many of whom fall ideologically outside the cultural Marxism movement. Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture has the following review https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Marxism+and+the+interpretation+of+culture&btnG=#d=gs_qabs&p=&u=%23p%3DmSVf4rJ_pMQJ https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Marx... ... If this collection is long and complicated, that is because Marxist theory has a long and complicated history: no simple summary or static model will suffice for a genuinely dialectical theory, one that works with the essential concepts of contradiction between the emergent and the persistent, mediation, and overdetermination. ...