The cultural marxism article being deleted was far from the result of "one person". There was a deletion discussion [0] with input from multiple users, as well

The cultural marxism article being deleted was far from the result of "one person". There was a deletion discussion [0] with input from multiple users, as well as a deletion review. [1] In fact, the discussion was closed by three independent and uninvolved admins. Additionally, the contents of the article were merged, so it's not as if any mention of the topic fell off the face of the earth. You should familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's notability guidelines for standalone [2] and what they entail, as well as the criteria for reliable sources. [3] Lastly, the Wikipedia article explains quite clearly that the so-called "academic movement" you're advocating is a term that was later co-opted by conspiracy theorists. Wikipedia is not for fringe theories. [4] [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cultural_Marxism_(2nd_nomination) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletio... [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2018_September_6#Cultural_Marxism_(2nd_nomination) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/... [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability [3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable... [4]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories