3 ms·
Actually I would argue that a marketplace is not part of the "means of production", at least not in any sense that Marx meant. In a similar way that if a black
by Illniyar 8y ago
Actually I would argue that a marketplace is not part of the "means of production", at least not in any sense that Marx meant.
In a similar way that if a blacksmith (or a farmer) made something and went to the market square to sell it, he isn't a Proletariat just because he doesn't own the market square (which by the way, some would require rent to use).
Most gig-economy workers operate in multiple platforms (at least when possible) - drivers are on both Lyft and Uber, AirBnB apartments are also rented directly or through other platforms.
It's not the fact that the sellers don't own the marketplace that leads to exploitation, it's the fact that the marketplace exploits it's monopoly to extort too much freedom away from the drivers.
I visited Ukraine a few weeks ago and drivers in the dominant ride-hailing app (Uklon I think) can refuse a ride if the pay is too low - this opens kind of a bid system.
While the experience was terrible as a user it does change the dynamics completely.