Generally there is no problem with a board of directors making their in meeting discussions private just as long as they clearly communicate the results of thos

Generally there is no problem with a board of directors making their in meeting discussions private just as long as they clearly communicate the results of those discussion to the membership. The problem here seems to be a section (8) in the new code of conduct which compels a director to politically support board decisions outside of meetings. Section 8 is now proceeded by the following message on the web site: "NOTE: ALL OF SECTION 8 HAS BEEN SUSPENDED BY ACTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS PENDING FURTHER STUDY AND REVIEW." That seems problematic as it does not refer to a particular motion at a particular board meeting. It is thus not clear that the section has actually been suspended. This whole thing strikes me as sloppy politics that eventually led to pointless infighting...