2 ms·
That's brutal. That said, you're not necessarily contradicting the OP. They were talking about cities demanding helmets via helmet laws. Whereas you (I think)
by graeme 8y ago
That's brutal. That said, you're not necessarily contradicting the OP. They were talking about cities demanding helmets via helmet laws.
Whereas you (I think) are recommending individuals use helmets, and also bicycle infrastructure.
OP isn't saying it's bad for an individual to wear a helmet. They're saying it's a bad requirement, because making helmets required will take marginal cyclists off the road. And fewer cyclists leads to more accidents like the ones you had, because drivers aren't used to cyclists.
- frereubu 8y agoI agree, I think they're complementary arguments. In London you need a helmet - the cycling environment demands it. In other places it sounds like that's different, and I envy people who live in those places!