>Insisting on the glamour and fun of coding is the wrong way to acquaint kids with computer science. This article approaches parody. This is as ridiculous as c

>Insisting on the glamour and fun of coding is the wrong way to acquaint kids with computer science. This article approaches parody. This is as ridiculous as criticizing programs that promote STEM by focusing on fun experiments. Kids don't need to know the full complexity of the field from the start. Michael Scott put it best: "You don't go to the science museum and get handed a pamphlet on electricity. You go to the science museum and you put your hand on a metal ball, your hair sticks up straight... and you know science."