3 ms·
More interesting are the county responses: Dallas County said it would follow the directive of the state and notify affected senders that they need to mail in
by thebradbain 8y ago
More interesting are the county responses:
Dallas County said it would follow the directive of the state and notify affected senders that they need to mail in a signature (without needing to resubmit entirely), even though they had already processed ~800 of the registrations as valid.
Travis County (Austin) responded to the Secretary of State that no– these are valid registrations, and counted them as such.
The bulk (>50%) of the registrations were in Austin, IIRC. Both of these counties are liberal strongholds in Texas. If Beto manages to win against Cruz by a margin of a couple thousand votes, I imagine the Cruz campaign will make this a much bigger issue than it is (and, imo, deservedly gain the title of trying to win by voter suppression).
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/2018-elections/2018/10/04/travis-county-going-secretary-state-says-will-accept-voter-registrations-filed-using-online-tool https://www.dallasnews.com/news/2018-elections/2018/10/04/tr...
- wemdyjreichert 8y agoIt could be an issue, though. By doing a partial roll-out, you're naturally making it easier for some groups to register. This could be partisan, and it could be innocent. But it might be best to avoid the appearance of impropriety.