5 ms·
This is kind of neat but why not just use pandoc? pandoc -s input.md -t html -o output.html https://pandoc.org/ https://pandoc.org/
by rubyn00bie 8y ago
This is kind of neat but why not just use pandoc?
pandoc -s input.md -t html -o output.html
https://pandoc.org/ https://pandoc.org/
- LeoPanthera 8y agoWow, thank you for this. That's quite incredible. Scriptable Word to HTML sounds so useful.
- Aelius 8y agoWhy would you want to constantly recompile documents every time you make an edit to them? Why would you want to juggle two files for every document you produce?
- kryptk 8y agoFor what it's worth, this is the problem GitLab Pages solves. A simple "git push" to a properly to figured repo will rebuild and redeploy your static site, the actual html output doesnt go into the repo.
- askmike 8y agoThis is for people who don't want to setup and manage a deployment pipeline hooked up to a git source code repo.
- dustingetz 8y agoSooo a live editor like this? http://www2.hyperfiddle.net/:markdown/ http://www2.hyperfiddle.net/:markdown/ If you like that, here's a little tweetstorm about hyperfiddle markdown: https://twitter.com/dustingetz/status/1048686717975388160 https://twitter.com/dustingetz/status/1048686717975388160
- ms013 8y agoExactly my thoughts. That’s where I landed for my site, and it’s really simple. Edit file, pandoc, scp to server, done.
- vortico 8y agoPandoc is kind of neat but why not just use markdown? markdown input.md > output.html
- BrandoElFollito 8y agoIt is a personal preference but I would rather know one tool they is more versatile (especially for such a task)