6 ms·
I was thinking of this scenario: https://xkcd.com/538/ https://xkcd.com/538/
by Bootvis 8y ago
I was thinking of this scenario:
https://xkcd.com/538/ https://xkcd.com/538/
- sjmulder 8y agoThis is the whole point of such a feature. Pipe wrench guy demands password, you give the duress password. Re. parent comments, I suppose you could have the script delete all traces of login_duress (and itself).
- Bootvis 8y agoMight be good to mention that in the readme.md then? Or make it an option in login_duress itself? I don’t understand the downvotes on my original comment.
- daveFNbuck 8y agoYour original comment is easy to misunderstand. Until reading the rest of the thread I thought you were suggesting that an adversary who hacked into your system could use login_duress against you.
- Bootvis 8y agoI see thanks, too late to edit.
- Kalium 8y agoNow pipe wrench guy comes back and beats you extra hard for tricking him, demanding you provide whatever info was there yourself. You might truthfully say you don't have it or don't remember it, but pipe wrench guy is no longer willing to trust what you tell him because you tricked him before. This might not be precisely a winning scenario.