3 ms·
> So what about third parties/reports/partners/contractors? Have they found anything and is Apple aware of those findings? Not disclosed here. Are the QC proces
by djrogers 8y ago
> So what about third parties/reports/partners/contractors? Have they found anything and is Apple aware of those findings? Not disclosed here.
Are the QC processes in place sufficient to lead us to believe that Apple would/should have found this issue? etc. If not, who cares if they haven't found it.
You’re making up new assertions from whole cloth - the original story claimed Apple found the chips then alerted the FBI. Apple explicitly and clearly denies every single aspect of the BW/Bloomberg story, and your objection to their denial is that they didn’t deny actions never presented in the article?
That’s called a straw man, and it doesn’t pass muster...
- Trombone12 8y agoIf the chip was found by a contractor of Apple then Bloomberg has indeed asserted something that is factually wrong. But it is not a materially important error, and calling it a "new assertion from whole cloth" is severely overstating the magnitude of the error. If someone that is talking about bash called linux for "a unix", I don't think most people would support your stance that they made completely baseless statement.