>Often they are, surprise, legally required to consider it. Well. They don't. This law is an example. >but it's better than nothing. No. It's worse than noth

>Often they are, surprise, legally required to consider it. Well. They don't. This law is an example. >but it's better than nothing. No. It's worse than nothing, and that's the point. It will do nothing to improve security and but leave the associated burden that wasn't there before.