3 ms·
"model results show that AHR has a significant impact on surface temperature and that it is able to affect global atmospheric circulation, leading to a 1-2 K in
by strainer 8y ago
"model results show that AHR has a significant impact on surface temperature and that it is able to affect global atmospheric circulation, leading to a 1-2 K increase in the high-latitude areas of Eurasia and North America. The results show that AHR is able to affect global climate despite being limited to a region."
Anthropogenic Heat Release: Estimation of Global Distribution and Possible Climate Effect
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jmsj/92A/0/92A_2014-A10/_article https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jmsj/92A/0/92A_2014-A10...
- jessriedel 8y agoThat paper confirms that carbon dioxide and other gases are the dominant cause of climate temperature changes, not anthopogenic heat release. It furthermore includes all anthropogenic heat (e.g., in cities), not just the heat release from combustion during power production which is relevant to our discussion. Since you apparently aren't arguing in good faith, I won't continue the discussion.
- strainer 8y agoThe paper indicates 1-2K of temperature increase from current levels of AHR which is 4 to 8 times as great as the hypothetical situation in the papers that you have now elected to insult me for criticizing. In the discussed papers ALL energy consumption is generated by renewables (includes transport, air conditioning etc). You must understand that entails ALL AHR (besides a tiny fraction of body heat) Presently almost all AHR is created by burning fossil fuels - producing waste heat (a portion of AHR) and useful energy which is used and then surely ?? you know this >> ends up as heat again (the other portion of AHR) So my faith is good here - you feel free not continue, especially in the manner you started.