4 ms·
It's classic divide and conquer. The ultra rich have framed politics as red vs. blue, when in reality it has always been (and always will be): them vs. the rest
by hnruss 8y ago
It's classic divide and conquer. The ultra rich have framed politics as red vs. blue, when in reality it has always been (and always will be): them vs. the rest of us.
- chasd00 8y agoi remember during the financial crisis thinking if only the tea party and the occupy crowd realized they were two sides to the same coin maybe something great could have happened. I feel like that dawned on the powers-that-be and the old divide and conquer technique was quickly applied; tea party turned far right, occupy turned far left and they've been fighting ever sense.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- longerthoughts 8y agoIt's eerily similar to the Machiavellian approach to alliances. Something along the lines of joining forces only with those who are weaker than you but can be used to amass power against your greatest threats. In the context of the examples you provided: major party identifies small group making noise, major party aligns themselves with that group, major party exploits that group as tool against opposing major party, major party under no obligation to truly pursue agenda of absorbed group due to relative power.
- chrisco255 8y agoThey definitely had the same spirit and were pissed off about many of the same things, but they differed drastically on the solutions...
- ppseafield 8y agoThe Tea Party was funded by the Koch brothers. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/oct/13/tea-party-billionaire-koch-brothers https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/oct/13/tea-party-bill...
- AnarchoYeasty 8y agoLol no occupy was always a leftist movement and the tea party was created by the Koch brothers. Centrists really need to stop trying to change history.