> I am slightly cautious that this hoax is itself a hoax and no actual hoax papers were published by actual academic journals. This is apparently the original

> I am slightly cautious that this hoax is itself a hoax and no actual hoax papers were published by actual academic journals. This is apparently the original account of the hoax. They had to call it off prematurely because they started getting media attention from places like the Wall Street Journal. I think the hoax is real.