4 ms·

Ford's testimony appeared credible. However, there is no contemporaneous corroboration, even from her long-time friend who not only didn't corroborate it, she r

Ford's testimony appeared credible. However, there is no contemporaneous corroboration, even from her long-time friend who not only didn't corroborate it, she refuted that she had even met Kavanaugh. Ramirez, Swetnik allegations are not credible. They too have no corroboration. While I've seen plenty of people decry Rachel Mitchell's letter to the Republican Senators as "political", I have yet to see anyone refute the content of that letter. (https://www.axios.com/brett-kavanaugh-rachel-mitchell-prosecutor-memo-2c3233cc-1d42-416b-af04-02700aa9a711.html https://www.axios.com/brett-kavanaugh-rachel-mitchell-prosec...) There isn't an honest prosecutor who could get an indictment, let alone a conviction.

dickinson99 8y ago
>Ford's testimony appeared credible Did you even watch it?
- jki275 8y ago
  I did, and I think she made up the entire thing. For a while I thought maybe she was assaulted in some way and was completely confused about when it happened and who was involved, but after the polygraph comments were refuted by her ex-boyfriend that sealed the deal for me -- it's almost axiomatic that because of her field of study she would be well informed on the subject, her denials to Ms. Mitchell seemed odd, but it appears clear now that she in fact did lie about it. That's not a minor detail, it's a very big deal.
- viggity 8y ago
  yes. the entire thing.
sjg007 8y ago
https://rewire.news/ablc/2018/10/04/contrary-to-conservative-claims-corroborating-evidence-exists-for-christine-blasey-fords-allegations/ https://rewire.news/ablc/2018/10/04/contrary-to-conservative...
- viggity 8y ago
  contemporaneous corroboration. Again, nobody has addressed all the holes as addressed by Rachel Mitchell.
  - sjg007 8y ago
    Sure, let's make stuff up, like her memo. https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/10/02/rachel-mitchell-memo-prosecuting-sex-crimes-ac-intv-vpx.cnn https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/10/02/rachel-mitche...

dickinson99 8y ago

>Ford's testimony appeared credible Did you even watch it?

jki275 8y ago
I did, and I think she made up the entire thing. For a while I thought maybe she was assaulted in some way and was completely confused about when it happened and who was involved, but after the polygraph comments were refuted by her ex-boyfriend that sealed the deal for me -- it's almost axiomatic that because of her field of study she would be well informed on the subject, her denials to Ms. Mitchell seemed odd, but it appears clear now that she in fact did lie about it. That's not a minor detail, it's a very big deal.
viggity 8y ago
yes. the entire thing.

sjg007 8y ago

https://rewire.news/ablc/2018/10/04/contrary-to-conservative-claims-corroborating-evidence-exists-for-christine-blasey-fords-allegations/ https://rewire.news/ablc/2018/10/04/contrary-to-conservative...

viggity 8y ago
contemporaneous corroboration. Again, nobody has addressed all the holes as addressed by Rachel Mitchell.
- sjg007 8y ago
  Sure, let's make stuff up, like her memo. https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/10/02/rachel-mitchell-memo-prosecuting-sex-crimes-ac-intv-vpx.cnn https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/10/02/rachel-mitche...