3 ms·

I don't understand how you believe it's a stretch that these dots are being connected. Why else would he have been there? He wasn't "in the same vicinity" as Ka

I don't understand how you believe it's a stretch that these dots are being connected. Why else would he have been there? He wasn't "in the same vicinity" as Kavanaugh. You make it seem like Kaplan decided to shadow a active court case and it "just happened" to be Kavanaugh's.

dvtrn 8y ago
"Why else would he have been there?" Because Kaplan and Kavanaugh according to the article are personal friends. I think to willfully ignore this is exactly what I mean by connecting dots that have no business being connected. Maybe I shouldn't be so eager to invoke Occam's Razor here but I am.