4 ms·
Of course. Apple/Amazon can be coerced into denying this (via government requests or otherwise). Bloomberg can't, nor is there any advantage for them to publish
by parliament32 8y ago
Of course. Apple/Amazon can be coerced into denying this (via government requests or otherwise). Bloomberg can't, nor is there any advantage for them to publish false information.
- jrnichols 8y ago> nor is there any advantage for them to publish false information. of course there is. It's called ad revenue and page views, both of which they're raking in today with these allegations. This story is all over the place. I don't trust Bloomberg with anything Apple at all and haven't for years now.
- late2part 8y agoHere is one motivation for false information. Financial gain. Someone could have made a lot of money with put options.
- jrnichols 8y agoYes, this too. Some of the Bloomberg and WSJ "leaks" feel like their primary motive has been subtle stock manipulation. In particular, the "demand is slowing for $PRODUCT" articles that we continue to see.