2 ms·
GraphQL is strongly typed though, and you can always use typescript, I wouldn’t personally advice it unless it works for you. We’ve not really seen any real tr
by eksemplar 8y ago
GraphQL is strongly typed though, and you can always use typescript, I wouldn’t personally advice it unless it works for you.
We’ve not really seen any real trouble moving to dynamic types, possibly because we utilize stuff like SOLID. When you’re not really using object oriented to its fullest, because it’s fullest adds complexity and complexity costs a lot of money and you’re already pretty fascist in your approach to how responsibility and changes are handled in your systems, dynamic types aren’t really a problem.
If I was building a huge system with a lot of complexity, I wouldn’t pick JavaScript, but I probably wouldn’t chose C# instead of JAVA either. And that’s not the way I would’ve viewed the world 5 years ago.
Anyway, I think people should use what works, I just think C# has lost its usefulness compared to other technologies and I really think web assembly is s terrible move for Microsoft.
But I’d love to be proven wrong.