3 ms·
Don't you mean that the other way around? "Any C++, Java, or Python, or <insert your lang here> program will eventually be written in a Lisp-based DSL that gen
by sova 8y ago
Don't you mean that the other way around? "Any C++, Java, or Python, or <insert your lang here> program will eventually be written in a Lisp-based DSL that generates that language" ? Seems far more accurate to me than to claim that all LISP functionality is derivable in (more rigid, less flexible) language. What prompted you to say this in the first place? If LISP is the mother language, of course all the rest are but a subset.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- Illniyar 8y agoThey rewrote Crash Bandicoot. It was originally written in lisp and is now written,I'm guessing, not in Lisp. The parent poster was factually correct. Your statement while still holds true isn't the opposite of what the parent said - you've replaced rewritten with written. If you said "Any C++, Java, or Python, or <insert your lang here> program will eventually be rewritten in a Lisp-based DSL that generates that language"- you would be factually wrong in this account.