4 ms·
"In the three years since the briefing in McLean, no commercially viable way to detect attacks like the one on Supermicro’s motherboards has emerged—or has look
by sounds 8y ago
"In the three years since the briefing in McLean, no commercially viable way to detect attacks like the one on Supermicro’s motherboards has emerged—or has looked likely to emerge."
I know a commercially viable way to detect hardware attacks.
Standardized hardware designs, such as the "x86 standard," ARM IP licenses, and more recently, RISC-V, decentralizes manufacturing and drives the cost to commodity levels. I'm specifically proposing that the U.S. Government appropriate the patents on whichever hardware design and declare them a National Security asset, and then guarantee royalty-free licenses to any company that wants to use them.
When it's no longer a big profit center, China is no longer as interested in owning a monopoly on it.
And presto: there's no longer a monopoly on the hardware. Thus it's no longer a guarantee that your hardware is being bent to the will of a single nation-state. Hardware attacks can be detected as variations between the hardware made by one nation vs. the hardware made by another nation.
The downside is that Apple can't have the same profit margins that come from closed, proprietary hardware.
The upside is that manufacturing and process innovation (such as Intel used to do) becomes extremely desirable. It becomes so valuable that we saw Intel reluctant to offshore their best processes.
There: economic solution and political points, to boot!
- 21 8y agoHave you read the article? Apparently one of the big factors in Supermicro success is that it has over 900 different motherboard designs, and hundreds of hardware specialists which can customize them further to client wishes.
- sounds 8y agoYour post is a non-sequitur. I'm not disagreeing that Supermicro makes customized designs.
- 21 8y agoIt is a sequitur in the sense that a few open-hardware motherboard designs will not be commercially successful.
- sounds 8y agoYour original post states: Apparently one of the big factors in Supermicro success is that it has over 900 different motherboard designs, and hundreds of hardware specialists which can customize them further to client wishes. How is that a sequitur arguing about "a few open-hardware motherboard designs" and the projections of them being "commercially succesful"?