3 ms·
Is there any advantage to this over https://send.firefox.com/ https://send.firefox.com/ ?
by trothamel 8y ago
Is there any advantage to this over https://send.firefox.com/ https://send.firefox.com/ ?
- luizfzs 8y agoThe first thing that come to mind is that you can self-host cryptsend, while it doesnt seem to be possible to self-host send.firefox.com
- rhblake 8y agoYou can indeed self-host Firefox Send: https://github.com/mozilla/send https://github.com/mozilla/send
- jvehent 8y agoOr use the docker container directly: $ docker pull mozilla/send https://github.com/mozilla/send/blob/master/docs/docker.md https://github.com/mozilla/send/blob/master/docs/docker.md
- severine 8y agoThanks. Do you know of other self-hosted Mozilla products with ready-made containers?
- m-p-3 8y agoThanks for sharing! Looks like I'll use one of my VPS for that.
- cmurf 8y agoIt says "Big Files" but I don't see an explicit size. Whereas send.firefox.com is 1GiB. Self hosted I imagine you're only limited by filesystem max file size. One thing I like about send.firefox.com is it's a one time download, and then the URL is denied to have ever existed. CryptSend sounds like you could share the URL with multiple destinations; multiple downloads.
- justusthane 8y agoFirefox Send doesn't have an explicit limit either: > For the most reliable operation, it’s best to keep your file under 1GB