6 ms·
I think analytically also, but I don't think that this is why Feynman became what he became, nor that focusing on truly understanding something is always the be
by devmonk 16y ago
I think analytically also, but I don't think that this is why Feynman became what he became, nor that focusing on truly understanding something is always the best tactic for success.
People that think analytically can really piss people off that aren't as obsessed with detail. I've learned this over time and have to turn myself off every once in a while.
It takes the right environment to excel, and I believe that Richard was blessed with one. But he was also just a remarkable person. Love his books.
- endtime 16y ago>People that think analytically can really piss people off that aren't as obsessed with detail. It goes both ways - I find it very frustrating when it feels like someone is refusing to answer a simple, specific question. (Of course, he may think I'm nitpicking, or not even understand what I'm saying...)
- nopassrecover 16y agoThe thing is, if it's trivial it should take a moment to answer (even if they look puzzled). I find when they can't answer the simple question it's because you knew this was a potential hole (which is why you asked it) and they're (even subconsciously) unsure about the implications of what you're asking.