4 ms·
That is possible but unlikely. Firstly you'd have to do this at the PCB fab phase as this can't be retrospectively applied, so you'd have to have infiltrated tw
by setquk 8y ago
That is possible but unlikely. Firstly you'd have to do this at the PCB fab phase as this can't be retrospectively applied, so you'd have to have infiltrated two times as many companies and add complex manufacturing exceptions to their workflow. Secondly you'd have to get it through AXI process which is used on these larger boards (Automated X-ray Inspection) which is used by the larger companies for manufacturing AND design validation. So you'd have to infiltrate another company.
Also stuff like this tends to show up on boundary scans. It's not that easy to cock around with signal integrity on these sorts of boards and get away with it.
I find the whole thing infeasible from a cost and logic perspective. The SMbus firmware and Aspeed sub-vendor are so much easier to hit and don't leave any corpses around to find after the fact.
- ceejayoz 8y agoI'm not sure "infiltrated" is the right word when discussing a state-level actor in a totalitarian country.
- setquk 8y agoThat's fair.
- abrichr 8y agoI'll accept that it may seem infeasible. But so did something like Stuxnet [1] seem infeasible, until it was discovered. Perhaps the lesson is not to underestimate the resources of a determined nation state with an economy the size of the USA's (or China's). [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet