On the other hand, you constantly see people defend ultra rich CEOs by dividing their salary across all employees in the company and showing how it would only b

On the other hand, you constantly see people defend ultra rich CEOs by dividing their salary across all employees in the company and showing how it would only be a raise of a few hundred a year. Those defenders then claim that's barely a raise so why take from the CEO? When you are minimum wage even 100 extra a year would have absolutely helped. I thinks it's fairly disengenous for any company to be raking in billions in profits while employees need public assistance to survive. Yea, you can suddenly double your work forces wage, but you can still improve the situation.