3 ms·
Effectively nothing can be constrained by a whitelisting firewall if you have a sufficiently bored actor. You can smuggle data through a variety of benign looki
by RL_Quine 8y ago
Effectively nothing can be constrained by a whitelisting firewall if you have a sufficiently bored actor. You can smuggle data through a variety of benign looking protocols, things that wouldn't matter in the least generally. Your average server contacts hundreds of different public NTP servers, binary repositories, domain name servers every day. If the keys to the kingdom are a 32 byte ECDSA private key, you've lost if you think you can protect this from reaching the outside world.
A method that wouldn't show up on any firewall in the world is simply to delay or drop certain SYN packets. Even if you only intended to transmit a bit at a time through this, any unauthenticated host on the internet could use this without raising any suspicion or even printing log lines in most environments. As soon are you're making an assumption that you're trying to prevent what's inside from getting out things become substantially closer to impossible than anybody would like.
- Narkov 8y agoFirewalls in high security environments aren't just port/protocol based. You lock everything down - source ip/port and destination ip/port. You should know where it is coming from and where it is going to. Navy ships don't upload via Dropbox.
- RL_Quine 8y agoIn the parent I described a system which would be able to communicate through those restrictions to another compromised host (remember we're assuming everything is compromised for the sake of this article, which actually seems like a good assumption now).
- FooHentai 8y agoNetworks where security is taken seriously implement data diodes, and this attack vector is mitigated.
- HillaryBriss 8y ago> remember we're assuming everything is compromised I think Bloomberg (and all related) web servers displaying the article are compromised and they're leaving out critical facts the point the finger elsewhere.
- bni 8y agoCertainly true, since Dropbox doesn't work on Windows XP anymore.